![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgL44rwMVeZKnVT9umtqpolSJR4fsqLLkE0RvCYAUwnD6yHeK3acUILySyRpZnA6EE9aHEvpuDyREAujYCgvHshoeu1x_5Z2QybU5he4BC8V4HM4-qdVwqCLyn6oWKMnSVB11KzphFSZWk/s320/small1.jpg)
Anyway, stuck to the front of our book is a sticker the likes of which all of us have seen. It reads "Now A Major Motion Picture."
Well, maybe in France.
But I got to thinking, 'Why does every motion picture have to be a major motion picture?' I mean, I get that it can't say, 'Now A Straight-To-DVD Video.' But what's wrong with just a motion picture or even a minor motion picture? What's wrong with keeping little discoveries and pleasures and minor tragedies and triumphs small?
The text, The Diving Bell And The Butterfly, is certainly not a major literary work. It's small, it's quiet, its scope, by necessity, is limited. It's observations are often mundane, because when you are completely at the mercy of others for your total care, what happens when a bandaid or a catheter comes loose is of supreme importance. And when your senses are nearly dormant due to a stroke, the memory of a bite of peasant sausage that "melts a little on your tongue before you start chewing to extract all its flavor" is worth both recalling and savoring. When you make enough progress with your speech therapist that you move your tongue the slightest bit, all possibilities open up, however briefly.
These small observations about life and its pleasures have an impact.
I think, without trying too hard, about minor motion pictures, and the one that comes to mind is The Cooler, starring William H. Macy, Maria Bello, and Alec Baldwin. Maybe you've seen it. In The Cooler, a down-on-his-luck guy is used by casinos to bring bad luck to other people. Then he falls in love, and his luck changes. And trouble ensues.
It's not a great movie, but it's a very solid one. It's certainly not a big movie, but the acting is far more accomplished than it is in big movies with big stars.
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEga238eSM1-FMLSfkCKy2XxPTfNCR8Nkz7zP2pvpZkezreebc6NC56J7uaTNcsDopi56JS7vM-A3n3hNe6epE_GrkbbQxr-z__Wm0EURZvLfK3d1-8VT7g_goedmiXyEFgrItBBG-dZegM/s320/small2.jpg)
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgocSOmM_LJjT4rtvv0xaXHtMppcFeIUoE0nlIjomrA2lZhphmTGmIqhHo7wF0oY9rzcXxs7bcenZBylkegUXPfeCLIAg0AJ8v3NRxgfsK61HzsEcLxjCkkm0Ei7AneECNNeHyN6fvN4Yc/s320/small3.bmp)
The instrumentation, indeed the songs, are not all that different from previous Sufjan offerings, except that he's recorded his voice differently, played up the acoustic guitars, and offered several, sometimes long, stretches of idiosyncratic electric guitar which is more choppy Neil Young than fluid Eric Clapton. A kind of deconstruction of Simon and Garfunkel, the songs, especially the title track (I prefer the classic rock version) insinuate themselves into your consciousness until you start to want them again without realizing it.
Little songs (though sometimes stretched out), forgotten movies, small statements--big results.
No comments:
Post a Comment