Bruce Springsteen and the E Street Band--"Trapped (live)" (mp3)
I spent a good bit of last night downloading and listening to a couple of Bruce Springsteen concerts. The concerts were not for sale. They were not official releases. Bruce, undoubtedly, would not be happy to know that they are available out there in cyberspace. Or else he doesn't care. Or else that space has gotten too big for music lawyers to keep up with all of it. Or.
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiLP9JybIg_iyxdz-qAFE4u5Z2r050XS6qhGxvwVe4VwdyYKtn6_Ak8_8a3kR3sN1iuWE9bwbYrIH5Yt7lk8JUqylqVUMLykcip19UaJfVCzERA_hZWIlj4eN1QSRDcGUBdBF17X1ijZdk/s320/bruce_68.jpg)
So when I saw that show online, not only did all of that college nostalgia kick in, but I also thought, 'I used to have that, that used to be mine, I'm going to get it again.' But was it mine? Yes, I did have a cassette of it, and record companies weren't clamoring to bust people making cassette copies of vinyl albums or radio broadcasts.
The second concert is from The Ghost Of Tom Joad tour, a tour I never saw. I did buy the cd, however, and have always thought it was underrated and undeservedly bashed by the critics. One review I read said that it was "tuneless," that there were no memorable melodies. I couldn't disagree more. I think the cd is full of beautiful, quiet songs. We presented at a conference in San Diego not long before or after its release, and just getting the sense, during that brief trip, of what life on the border, life in "Balboa Park," was all about, made the cd more poignant. So, I was excited yesterday to hear what some of those songs sounded like live. I bought the cd, the concert tour came nowhere near me, and I had very young children at the time anyway. So last night, guilt-free, I downloaded that show, too.
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjjr4GINXwl30bH_RwC8jRj2efC0k2V6ScSkU834cz3Bp1M5CvoIThM3u5ByGiRblYk-L3gn0E7EKMDnYENj7ddhgWs1d8mBGL2KDPxXHj24LOezYtlJiAKSDjT8VgM0MpGG8VlS-68ATk/s320/bruce07.jpg)
As I see it, there are two issues here. The first is quality control. I understand that artists who slave over putting out, say, a cd that they worked on for three years may be disappointed to think that some raw, slightly off-key outtake or live version of their stuff is out there for public consumption. The second is money. By law, that artist has royalty rights for every sale and performance of his or her music. God knows, we all like the money, and I'm not going to try to argue that such-and-such an artist already has enough money. I don't know and I don't care. But after my own "career" of collecting and listening to music for 45 years, there are some five or six artists, a slightly-shifting list, whose output has engaged me so much that I'm interested in hearing whatever of their music that I can, regardless of the source. And I pursue that goal, from time to time, without apology.
I know it's impossible to distinguish me from some virulent Chinese conglomerate selling Springsteen knock-offs all over Asia, but I'm not trying to make money, I'm just trying to hear what was played. I know it's skewed, I know it's indefensible, but I have come to believe that if an artist played it and someone recorded it, it's okay for me to hear it. Sorry, Bruce. Ultimately, the passage of time will prove me right.
No comments:
Post a Comment